Proof of Media Coverup of Anthrax Vaccine Safety Record

Posted by Bob Mantz on January 06, 2004 at 04:21:58:

A big victory for anti-forced vaccines. A federal judge ruled soldiers cannot be forced to take the Anthrax Vaccine.

However, I found something very troubling. I searched Google News using the first few words from the article in my local paper "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs". It returned 81 pages where you could find the AP article on the ruling.

But there is an extremely important paragraph in this article. "A leaflet inserted with the product, which originally stated that adverse reaction occurred in 0.2 percent of cases, was recently revised to reflect a rate between 5 percent and 35 percent, the ruling said. It said there have been at least six deaths linked to the vaccine."

So it went from .2 to between 5 and 35 percent!!!!!!!

So I now took the term "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs" and added "0.2" to it. And guess what? Several of the newspapers edited out that part. Completely gone. For instance, the LA Times:

http://www.sunspot.net/news/health/bal-te.court23dec23,0,5075044.story?coll=bal-health-headlines

No mention of it.

The Boston Globe:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/12/23/pentagon_cant_require_anthrax_vaccine_us_judge_rules/

Not there.

USA Today?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-12-22-military-anthrax_x.htm

No.

The New York Times edited it:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/national/23ANTH.html?ex=1072760400&en=49a06d62063991b3&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

This is unacceptable, deceitful, and wrong.

Thankfully Foxnews has left it in:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106413,00.html

By, Bob Mantz, Jr., Herbalist
www.bobmantz.com
www.curezone.com

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: A big victory for anti-forced vaccines. A federal judge ruled soldiers cannot be forced to take the Anthrax Vaccine. : However, I found something very troubling. I searched Google News using the first few words from the article in my local paper "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs". It returned 81 pages where you could find the AP article on the ruling. : But there is an extremely important paragraph in this article. "A leaflet inserted with the product, which originally stated that adverse reaction occurred in 0.2 percent of cases, was recently revised to reflect a rate between 5 percent and 35 percent, the ruling said. It said there have been at least six deaths linked to the vaccine." : So it went from .2 to between 5 and 35 percent!!!!!!! : So I now took the term "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs" and added "0.2" to it. And guess what? Several of the newspapers edited out that part. Completely gone. For instance, the LA Times: : http://www.sunspot.net/news/health/bal-te.court23dec23,0,5075044.story?coll=bal-health-headlines : No mention of it. : The Boston Globe: : http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/12/23/pentagon_cant_require_anthrax_vaccine_us_judge_rules/ : Not there. : USA Today? : http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-12-22-military-anthrax_x.htm : No. : The New York Times edited it: : http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/national/23ANTH.html?ex=1072760400&en=49a06d62063991b3&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE : This is unacceptable, deceitful, and wrong. : Thankfully Foxnews has left it in: : http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106413,00.html : : By, Bob Mantz, Jr., Herbalist : www.bobmantz.com : www.curezone.com